Make sure the Symbol font is enabled on your browser...I'll use ¶ for the complex differentiation operator.
Let G be a bounded connected (open) region in the complex plane, and let f:G®G be an analytic mapping. Suppose there exists z0ÎG with f(z0)=z0, and that |¶f(z0)| is less than 1. Define f1(z)=f(z), and inductively, fn+1(z)=f(fn(z)). Note that this makes sense, since the range of fn is contained in the domain of f, and that all the fn are analytic, and, by induction, fn(z0)=z0 for all n. The goal is to show that fn converges to the constant function z0 uniformly on compact subsets of G.
Differentiate:
¶fn+1(z)=¶[f(fn(z))]=¶f(fn(z))¶fn(z)
¶fn(z)=Õ¶f(fk(z)), k=0..n-1
Must be off now, but I'll finish later.
UPDATE: Okay, I solved it in the shower just now. Since {fn} is a normal family, it contains a subsequence {fnk} converging uniformly on compacta to some function g. By Weierstrass' Theorem, g is analytic, and ¶fnk converges uniformly to ¶g on compacta. But these derivatives are converging to 0 on an open neighbourhood of z0, so, since nonzero analytic functions have only isolated zeroes, these derivatives are converging to 0, and hence ¶g=0: since G is connected, and g(z0)=z0, g is the constant function z0. Now, fix a compact subset K of G. {fn} is equicontinuous on K, so "e $d so that if |z-z0| is less than d, then for all n, |fn(z)-fn(z0)|=|fn(z)-z0| is less than e. Furthermore, there exists nK such that |fnK(z)-z0| is less than d for all z in K. Thus, for all z in K, for all m, |fm(fnK(z))-z0|=|fnK+m(z)-z0| is less than e. Therefore, for all large n, |fn(z)-z0| is less than e for all z in K: fn converges uniformly to z0 on all compact subsets of G. QED
Posted by aloysius at July 23, 2003 12:31 PM | TrackBack |Babba Booey! Dick! Nuts!
Posted by: GOPslooter on July 24, 2003 06:54 AM