January 09, 2004
To the Moon, Alice

As perhaps you may have heard, America's Fearless Leader, the Son King, may soon propose a glorious new scheme to send Americans to the Moon once again, as a warm-up to a manned Mars expedition. It is rather appropriate, given what a space cadet the miserable failure is.

Sources involved in the discussions said Bush and his advisers view the new plans for human space travel as a way to unify the country behind a gigantic common purpose at a time when relations between the parties are strained and polls show that Americans are closely divided on many issues.

"It's going back to being a uniter, not a divider," a presidential adviser said, echoing language from Bush's previous campaign, "and trying to rally people emotionally around a great national purpose."

It's also stupid. And I'd say the same thing if it were proposed by a President Dean, or a President Clark, or a President Nimoy rather than a President Bush.

Now, don't get me wrong. Unlike certain people, I have no objections to manned space flight in theory. I like the idea. I'm sufficiently interested in the hardware involved that, in my younger days, I nearly went into aerospace engineering. I consume a lot of science fiction. Space probes fill me with pleasure. My picture of the ideal future involves things like solar power satellites, asteroid mining, and permanent habitats at L5. Ideally speaking, I would be a total space freaknut.

That being said, it's still stupid.

This Gregg Easterbrook character, who is apparently famous, or reputable, or something, has already pointed out that such a venture would gobble up cash like a maddened thing that gobbles. And he isn't wrong. I guess Easterbrook isn't the gaseous universal prat I'd taken him for. Who knew?

Anyhow, as Easty notes, this project is also bad science. Any Lunar outpost liable to be approved would be a less floaty version of the International Space Station: hideously expensive, troublesome to maintain and support, scientifically sort of useless, and an unspeakable sinkhole sucking away wodges of cash from real science programmes. And basically a pork project to blow dollars up the arse of the aerospace industry, just as the ISS is partially there to keep Russian engineers building space hardware rather than, say, long-range ballistic missiles for naughty, naughty countries who mostly hate gays.

And why might George W. Bush endorse a Moon base or Mars mission? Either he's a science illiterate surrounded by advisors who are science illiterates, or it's a blank check for aerospace contractors.

I'm thinking a little from Column A, a little from Column B.

Sometimes NASA makes me so angry...Some day, manned spaceflight will be a wonderful, practical, useful thing, supplying our planet with clean, inexhaustable power, wacky new zero-gravity industrial products, new frontiers to orgasmify the human spirit, and somewhere to send people we don't especially like having around, like Lance Bass. But that day is not today. There is very little up there worth doing in the near future that machines can't do for us for a fraction of the cost, and without the risk of blowing people up and dumping their ashes somewhere horrid like Texas. There isn't a science payoff to sending people up. There isn't an industrial or real technological one, without some kind of unimaginably mega-huge attempt to build full-scale Lunar mines, orbital factories, and all manner of not-immediately-practical offworld infrastructure. People are fat and moist and gassy. Machines are slick and efficient, and don't need air, or magazines, or innovative zero-g toilets. Machines don't bitch about being sent on multi-year missions that force them to miss several seasons of Angel. They're just better.

As they stand, the Space Shuttle and the ISS just should not exist. Nor should this crackpot Moon scheme. All that money could be spent to much greater effect developing a reusable launch vehicle that doesn't suck. And sending more probes to Uranus.

I have a burning desire to probe Uranus.

I want to know more about its curious moon Miranda, goddammit.

This is nothing but a slime-encrusted ploy to exploit idealism for partisan political purposes ('uniter' my ass) and pork, and I for one am miffed. Miffed, I say!

Posted by aloysius at January 09, 2004 07:28 PM | TrackBack |
Comments

Would you say it is fairly likely that this scheme will blow up in Bush's ignorant monkeyface and leave America with an ever lower opinion of his leadership abilities than they currently have? This seems likely to me, and I must say very desirable. I'm currently reading 2001, and it really makes spaceflight seem quite fascinating. However, even the mission described in the book so far doesn't seem to need humans. I'm sure a machine could just as easilly venture to the outer reaches of the solar system and become a space-baby.

Also, isn't there healthcare to be paid for? This should perhaps be done first. You know, keep people from dying of perfectly curable medical conditions and the like.

Listen, I'm not my father! I don't do kung fu, I'm a cop! That's who I am, that's what I do!

Posted by: Clake on January 11, 2004 01:57 PM

The proposed space program is litle more than a smoke screen to distract the punters from the lack of jobs, health care and tax breaks that the government has fouled up. It's same deal as the the Wizard of Oz, watch the pretty lights and ignore the man behind the curtain.

Posted by: Red Wolf on January 11, 2004 03:10 PM

Hullo Aloysius. Here be my two cents:

I can't see a lot of point in people going back to the moon, and I think the idea of a lunar base is misguided. Any space programme should, y'know, work towards meaningful goals or something. Off the top of my head, some meaningful goals would be the first steps towards asteroid mining (e.g. surveying the many individual non-belt asteroids easily and safely accessible from earth), and perhaps also the first (research) steps towards a mars mission.

The asteroid mining stuff should be fairly self-explanatory (and appealing) even to Republicans: there are big agglomerations of platinum group metals floating in space, and these can be traded for fun and profit! Along the way we learn a lot of useful techniques for our glorious spacefaring future, e.g. how to reliably stop irregular massive objects spinnning crazily.

For the mars mission, at the moment we should perhaps be investigating things like spinning tethered objects for simulated gravity (e.g. a capsule and its booster), radiation shielding for interplanetary conditions (i.e. solar flares outside of the relative comfort of earth orbit etc) -- things we can't do on the ISS or on the moon.

I hear Bush has a bit of a deficit to deal with (and some monetary problems too, ha ha), so the longer term stuff can wait until the coffers are full of Iraqi gold or whatever. But for now, if he wants to do something noble in space, he should be looking at the boring things above, or dumping a few million into the very exciting X-Prize and getting the same PR buzz cheaply (at least as long as the US teams are favourites).

Some links as MT has helpfully parsed them out of my text:
http://www.permanent.com/i-index.htm
http://www.nw.net/mars/
http://www.xprize.org/

Posted by: sbszine on January 11, 2004 04:50 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?