I should have been paying closer attention! Weeks ago now, Kathryn Cramer blogged on an experiment carried out by Dr Shahriar S. Afshar, which appears to offer solid evidence at last that the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics is, in fact, rubbish: Afshar has been popping photons through a pair of pinholes, and, by means of a cunning arrangement of wires, has found that wave phenomena like interference persist even when he's measuring particle properties of the photons, like which pinhole they're passing through. The good news is that, according to the canonical Copenhagen Interpretation, this can't happen. The really good news is that I never liked the Copenhagen Interpretation anyhow, and it's one of the things (along with data analysis and sloppy maths) that drove me away from physics. It's aesthetically and intellectually wholly unsatisfying, unable to offer a satisfactory explanation for why wavefunctions should collapse and filled with dark and terrible suggestions that measurement by a conscious observer is somehow a priviliged act. It has no business corresponding to the physical world, and I for one will fiddle while it burns, if in fact these preliminary results are borne out. There will be papers out soon.
The Transactional Interpretation of the University of Washington's own John Cramer appears to survive this experiment unscathed, which is excellent, as I think the Transactional Interpretation is splendid. Aesthetically, I find it highly appealing, because of a much greater degree of time-symmetry: interactions are built not just of waves propagating forwards in time, but waves propagating backwards as well. And it makes me think of the universe as a vast spiderweb glistening with dew.
Good news at last, at a time when America's leadership seems bent on taking the country straight to the inner circles of Hell, without passing GO or collecting $200.
Posted by aloysius at May 11, 2004 12:11 PM | TrackBack |I don't know much of what you speak, but I must say that I don't like any theory put forth to me that involves things suddenly popping into existance when some intelligence observes them. It seems a bit, umm, what's the term physicists use? "Buckfuck crazy?" Yes. I'm glad to hear that one such theory has gotten its come-uppance. Let that be a lesson to scientists: Just because you observe something that you currently can't account for it's no reason to spew a bunch of new-age ass-radish about how maybe consciousness creates reality and what if God was one of us and how many roads must a man walk down. Buck up and get back in the lab!
Wow, that felt good! I love ranting about things I know precious little about. You should try it - it's fun!
Posted by: clake on May 11, 2004 01:57 PMNonsense. Cramer's interpretation relies on Ashfar's experiment. If you Google for the latter, what you get is comments such as this one:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mmcirvin/112252.html
Ashfar's article was actually pulled from the preprint archive at arXiv, something unheard of till now.